![]() Perhaps it is to ensure that any political fallout associated with such inhumane treatment of children can be blamed on someone other than those who merely set the stage for subsequent state action. Perhaps the reason is to ensure that the inevitable legal challenges that follow are directed to the state governments (versus federal government). They contend that the new amendment makes explicit a congressional position that leaves the decision to provide or deny access to education strictly to the states (civil rights issues and due process concerns notwithstanding).Ĭonveniently, the proposal leaves the decision to deny access to children of undocumented workers to the states. Doe decision had rested in part on the “lack” of a clear position by the Congress on the issue of immigrant children’s access to education. Proponents of the measure justified their position by suggesting that the Plyler vs. Illogical RationaleĪs IDRA tracked the debates around the immigrant education issue, we noted the rationale used to defend this punitive and discriminatory treatment of immigrant children. Media reports indicate that President Clinton is expected to sign the final bill, but the White House has expressed concern over some provisions – including the proposal that would deny children access to an education – and is pressing for changes when the conference committee meets (Lacey, 1996). Currently, a conference committee is convening to reconcile the House and Senate versions. Senate leaders opted to leave the controversial measure out of their version of the immigration reform bill. The Gallegly amendment was approved by a vote that closely followed partisan lines. Congressman Elton Gallegly from California thus introduced an amendment to HR 2022, a comprehensive immigration reform proposal originally introduced by Congressman Lamar Smith of Texas. So, they sought to involve others in their exclusionary quest. ![]() public schools came from members of Congress from California who had been thwarted in their efforts to deny children access to education through a state referendum, Proposition 187 (which the federal district courts found violates the US Supreme Court decision in Plyler vs. The impetus for re-surfacing the issue of whether or not children of undocumented workers should have access to education in U.S. Recent developments in Washington, D.C., related to the education of children of undocumented workers bring to mind that child as some lawmakers seek to re-visit an issue that states and the courts resolved over a decade ago. Jose Cárdenas periodically would tell us the story of the child who received a hammer as a gift and subsequently “discovered” that many things around him needed a few taps with his new found instrument (whether the object to be hammered needed the tapping or not). In our many years of working together, I remember how Dr. Ventanilla de Orientación Educativa (VOE).Students in Technology Explorations – Moving to STEM.Parent Involvement & Leadership Development.Evaluation, Research and Needs Assessment.Data Services to Inform Teaching & Learning.Evaluation, Research and Needs Assessment Services.Texas Legislative Education Equity Coalition.Georgia Coalition for Education Justice.Preparing All Students to Succeed in College.Growing and Sustaining Healthy School Districts.Ensuring Fair School Funding for All Students.Ensuring Excellent Educational Opportunities for English Learners.Ending Harmful Discipline to Create Safer Schools.Policy, Advocacy and Community Engagement Home.Policy, Advocacy and Community Engagement.IDRA Ventanilla de Orientación Educativa.Donate to Support Education During COVID-19 Crisis.Courage to Connect: A Quality Schools Action Framework.Our Story – Transforming Education by Putting Children First.Immigrant Education Policy: Why Attempt to Fix What’s Not Broken? - IDRA Close Menu
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |